23 research outputs found

    Contributions of Nanoscale Roughness to Anomalous Colloid Retention and Stability Behavior

    Get PDF
    All natural surfaces exhibit nanoscale roughness (NR) and chemical heterogeneity (CH) to some extent. Expressions were developed to determine the mean interaction energy between a colloid and a solid−water interface, as well as for colloid−colloid interactions, when both surfaces contain binary NR and CH. The influence of heterogeneity type, roughness parameters, solution ionic strength (IS), mean zeta potential, and colloid size on predicted interaction energy profiles was then investigated. The role of CH was enhanced on smooth surfaces with larger amounts of CH, especially for smaller colloids and higher IS. However, predicted interaction energy profiles were mainly dominated by NR, which tended to lower the energy barrier height and the magnitudes of both the secondary and primary minima, especially when the roughness fraction was small. This dramatically increased the relative importance of primary to secondary minima interactions on net electrostatically unfavorable surfaces, especially when roughness occurred on both surfaces and for conditions that produced small energy barriers (e.g., higher IS, lower pH, lower magnitudes in the zeta potential, and for smaller colloid sizes) on smooth surfaces. The combined influence of roughness and Born repulsion frequently produced a shallow primary minimum that was susceptible to diffusive removal by random variations in kinetic energy, even under electrostatically favorable conditions. Calculations using measured zeta potentials and hypothetical roughness properties demonstrated that roughness provided a viable alternative explanation for many experimental deviations that have previously been attributed to electrosteric repulsion (e.g., a decrease in colloid retention with an increase in solution IS; reversible colloid retention under favorable conditions; and diminished colloid retention and enhanced colloid stability due to adsorbed surfactants, polymers, and/or humic materials)

    Comparison of Types and Amounts of Nanoscale Heterogeneity on Bacteria Retention

    No full text
    Interaction energy calculations that assume smooth and chemically homogeneous surfaces are commonly conducted to explain bacteria retention on solid surfaces, but experiments frequently exhibit signification deviations from these predictions. A potential explanation for these inconsistencies is the ubiquitous presence of nanoscale roughness (NR) and chemical heterogeneity (CH) arising from spatial variability in charge (CH1), Hamaker constant (CH2), and contact angles (CH3) on these surfaces. We present a method to determine the mean interaction energy between a colloid and a solid-water-interface (SWI) when both surfaces contained binary NR and CH. This approach accounts for double layer, van der Waals, Lewis acid-base, and Born interactions. We investigate the influence of NR and CH parameters and solution ionic strength (IS) on interaction energy profiles between hydrophilic and hydrophobic bacteria and the SWI. Increases in CH1 and CH3 reduce the energy barrier and create deeper primary minima on net electrostatically unfavorable surfaces, whereas increasing CH2 diminishes the contribution of the van der Waals interaction in comparison to quartz and makes a more repulsive surface. However, these roles of CH are always greatest on smooth surfaces with larger fractions of CH. In general, increasing CH1 and CH3 have a larger influence on bacteria retention under lower IS conditions, whereas the influence of increasing CH2 is more apparent under higher IS conditions. However, interaction energy profiles are mainly dominated by small fractions of NR, which dramatically lower the energy barrier height and the depths of both the secondary and primary minima. This significantly increases the relative importance of primary to secondary minima interactions on net electrostatically unfavorable surfaces, especially for conditions that produce small energy barriers on smooth surfaces. Energy balance calculations indicate that this primary minimum is sometimes susceptible to diffusive removal depending on the NR and CH parameters
    corecore